Tesla Model S Charge Port Door -- U.S. Spec

Nissan, BMW, Look to Adopt Tesla’s Charging Standard

Last week, Tesla CEO Elon Musk announced that the Californian automaker would turn its entire patent library open source, making Tesla plans, technology and schematics open to anyone who wanted to use them ‘in good faith’.

Three days later, it appears two of Tesla Motors’ [NASDAQ:TSLA] biggest rivals — Nissan and BMW — are looking to co-operate on charging networks and charging technology.

Tesla Model S Charge Port Door -- U.S. Spec

Is Tesla’s Supercharger standard about to become the industry standard?

That’s according to the Financial Times (subscription required), who says that both Nissan and BMW are keen to enter into a joint agreement to build and maintain charging networks that Tesla, BMW, and Nissan owners could use.

As Musk admitted himself last week in a media Q&A session following the announcement that Tesla was turning all of its patents into freely-available information under the open-source model, top BMW executives travelled to Palo Alto the day before Tesla’s monumental announcement to discuss how they could work more closely together.  Sharing Tesla’s supercharging technology was most certainly on the agenda.

“We talked about potential ways to collaborate and one of them was on the Supercharging network,” Musk said on Thursday last week. “We’re more than happy for others to use our Supercharger network or to build and install them and then have some sort of cross-use agreement.”

While neither Nissan nor BMW are keen to officially state their intentions, one executive involved in the tri-company discussion said that it made sense for them all to work together. While BMW and Tesla stress their meeting was coincidentally timed with the patent announcement, it does lend credence to the idea that there are moves afoot for the companies to cooperate. Given the fact that automakers often cooperate on other technologies, from engine design to platform sharing, charging technology cooperation is extremely plausible.

“It is obviously clear that everyone would benefit if there was a far more simple way for everyone to charge their cars,” one executive said, declining to be named at the time due to the incomplete nature of the talks.

Nissan currently favors CHAdeMO Quick Charging -- but it's limited to 62.5 kW maximum power.

Nissan currently favors CHAdeMO Quick Charging — but it’s limited to 62.5 kW maximum power.

Currently, while all three electric car companies make use of direct current quick charging to charge their respective electric cars, each company uses a different charging standard.

Nissan and BMW both use 50 kilowatt direct current methods, capable of recharging an average electric car battery pack from empty to 80 per cent full in around 30 minutes. Nissan’s DC quick charge technology uses the CHAdeMO quick charge connector from Japan, while BMW favours the newer, German-derived Combined Quick Charge Standard — known in the industry as CCS.  While both protocols charge at the same rate they are physically incompatible with one another due to different connectors.

Tesla, on the other hand, uses its own proprietary DC quick charge standard known as Supercharging. Capable of recharging at up to 135 kilowatts, it can recharge a Tesla Model S 85 kilowatt-hour battery pack from empty to 80 per cent full in 40 minutes. What sets Tesla’s technology aside however is the range added during that time. In the Nissan LEAF and BMW i3, their 30 minutes of rapid charging will add between 60 and 80 miles of range. In Tesla’s case, it will add upwards of 170 miles of range in a similar amount of time.

Historically, Tesla has always been happy for other car companies to adopt the Tesla Supercharging standard — and its unique, compact charge connector — for use in their own vehicles. The only stipulation has been that those using Tesla’s Supercharging standard adhere to Tesla’s philosophy on charging stations: in other words, never charging customers to recharge at the point of use. Instead, Tesla wants other car companies to work in the cost of supporting a charging network into the car sticker price, ensuring customers never pay to refuel again.

In Thursday’s press conference, Musk added another stipulation: high speed capability.

CCS could be dead before it even gets a hold on the market if BMW moves to Tesla's system.

CCS could be dead before it even gets a hold on the market if BMW moves to Tesla’s system.

“It has to be able to charge at high speed — at least 135 kilowatt level — so that people have the convenience of high speed charging,” he said. “And then there’s some reasonable cost share proportionate to the respective vehicle fleets.”

Since both BMW and Nissan are rumoured to be discussing future collaboration with Tesla on rapid charging technology, these particular requirements do not seem to be causing any problems. For Nissan, which is rumoured to be developing a longer-range LEAF electric hatchback for release some time in 2016, a switch to Tesla charging technology could help it solve a number of major logistical nightmares.

For a start, Nissan’s current chosen technology for rapid charging — CHAdeMO DC quick charging — is limited by its current design to a little over 60 kilowatts of power. On current generation Nissan LEAFs with just 24 kilowatt-hours of on-board storage that power limitation isn’t a problem.

On a vehicle with a larger battery pack which is double, or even triple that of current generation LEAFs, that results in a quick charging taking more than an hour. Adopting Tesla’s far faster, more powerful charging technology would give Nissan a way to build a longer range 150-200 mile car without sacrificing charging time in the process.

Then there’s practicality. Tesla’s modular Supercharger design and multiple stalls per location means that a Supercharger site can continue to operate — even at reduced capacity or lower power — if there’s a fault.  When a CHAdeMO DC quick charger fails, it fails completely — and there tends to be just one unit per location. While there are now hundreds of CHAdeMO quick charge stations around the U.S., the CHAdeMO DC quick charge standard has proven woefully unreliable for Nissan.

When it comes to BMW the case to move toward Supercharger technology is even greater. Unlike Nissan, BMW has no DC quick charging network to speak of in either the U.S. or Europe. Last time we checked, the number of CCS-compatible quick charge stations were negligible compared to DC CHAdeMO and Tesla Supercharger numbers.

We all like Superchargers, both for their design and their awesome speed.

We all like Superchargers, both for their design and their awesome speed.

“Nissan welcomes any initiative to expand the volumes of electric vehicles,” a Nissan spokesperson told the FT. “Nissan is the market leader in EVs and has worked with other manufacturers to help proliferate the technology.”

At the time of writing, we don’t know for sure what Nissan, BMW and Tesla’s joint plan will involve, but we’re confident that its effects will be as groundbreaking for the automotive industry as the birth of fuel injection.  Most importantly, it will change the face of owning an electric car forever.


Want to keep up with the latest EV news? Don’t forget to follow Transport Evolved on Twitter, like us on Facebook and G+, and subscribe to our YouTube channel.


Want to keep up with the latest news in evolving transport? Don’t forget to follow Transport Evolved on Twitter, like us on Facebook and G+, and subscribe to our YouTube channel.

You can also support us directly as a monthly supporting member by visiting Patreon.com.

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Share on LinkedInDigg thisShare on RedditEmail this to someonePin on Pinterest

Related News

  • CDspeed

    I hope this means both BMW and Nissan will start building electric cars that are comparable to their gasoline cars. The Model S was instantly comparable to it’s petrol powered competition, so hopefully this will give BMW and Nissan the needed boost to take a leap in electric car evolution.

  • Mike D

    You should know that Chademo is not limited to 60kw by design.nnThe specification states a 90kw rating, and there is no reason that it would not be able to push further with a improved connector.nnAs the Tesla Supercharger have been recently installed and are like the Model S limited in number, we do not know about their real life reliability.nnBy the way, BMW just launched a Chademo I3 in Japan and Tesla is about to release a Chademo adapter for the Model S… I would not consider Chademo to be end of life just yet.nnNissan is currently doubling up the Chademo QC installation in the UK and will probably do the same elsewhere as more cars hit the market.nnCheers.nnMike D.

    • just someone old

      You can install the most spectacular number of chargingstations, with spectacular chargingrates, but if reliability is spectacular low, people will spectacularly fast search for other solutions

    • Dennis Pascual

      I often use the Hawthorne Superchargers in Los Angeles (historically the busiest superchargers on the network). There have historically been six bays at the location and one or two would occasionally be inoperative. Tesla often will have the station repaired within a day of report and has since augmented this location with two more superchargers that are there as overflow.nnThe difference is that the Tesla Superchargers are monitored and responded to repair by Tesla in a better manner than most public charging station providers in either side of the Pond.

    • D. Harrower

      Personally, my issue with CHAdeMO is that its connector looks like it belongs on a fire hydrant. Tesla’s connector is microscopic by comparison. One look at each end of a Tesla CHAdeMO adapter illustrates this quite well:nnhttp://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0001/5660/products/Chademo_US_shot_02_1024x1024.jpg?v=1391736779

  • CDspeed

    I had another quick thought on this subject, Toyota, they have a stake in Tesla, yet they’re almost ignoring it to mess about with hydrogen. Now BMW, and an even closer rival, Nissan may take Toyota’s lead on working with Tesla from them. While Toyota could have been a leader in automotive electrification, evolving from hybrids to EVs, and could have gone even further with their investment in Tesla, I really think they have hurt themselves in a way that will catch up to them in a few years time.

  • alvord1430

    The Tesla connector is so simple and streamlined. It handles both low and high power situations. It makes me wonder what the industry was thinking when they came up with the more unusual J1772 and CHAdeMO connectors.

  • Tom Zukow

    Here is statement from Chademo organization:nOne of the key trade-offs when installing a fast charger is that the optimal power output depends on two factors: the cost of delivering the required power at the infrastructure side, and the charging time which is also dependent on the battery performance and state of the technology.nnBringing the required power to the charger includes both the cost of the hardware as well as the cost of connecting to the grid at the required level. The majority of utility companies around the world supported CHAdeMOu2019s view in eventually setting the most appropriate power level at 50KW.nnIn the future, as the price of the power units continues to decrease and the performance of the battery continues to improve, faster and higher power chargers be eventually necessary. In fact, the geometry of CHAdeMO connector is designed to allow for 200A, which means it can almost double its power level.nnOn the other hand, the installation of 20KW units require much less output power and can be an ideal charging solution in certain urban or commercial areas where access to higher power level is not readily available. This flexibility on both ends of the charging power spectrum demonstrates the clear competitive potential of the CHAdeMO in the market.

  • Justin C

    Regarding Tesla and BMW collaboration… Here in the UK the Tesla finance package is provided by BMW Financial Services… I do hope that the Tesla dc charging standard is adopted by all, it is clearly a superior architecture to CCS and ChaDEMov with in-built redundancy and hence reliability. nAs my wife is an owner of a BMW i3 I know it is a great car and complimentary to the equally great Tesla, a Model S will replace my E-Class early next year.

  • Rob Kay

    Lets have a single standard plug, a single card, and the best fast charging that is affordable. There are always going to be compromises. And if there are not, they will all fail.

  • Steven Ingham

    So what happens to all the current and older Leafs? Would the quick charging networks eventually disappear leaving their owners with nothing but level 2 at home? Nissan isn’t likely to offer upgrades. They won’t even put a quick charger in an older leaf that wasn’t factory equipped. Hey Nissan I love you guys but that just isn’t cool!! It won’t bankrupt you to make a post assembly line quick charger unit. Will there be an after market selling these products? I’m really close to getting a Leaf. I’m paying attention and watching.

Content Copyright (c) 2016 Transport Evolved LLC