Musk says you will be able to place your $1,000 reservation for a Model 3 on March 31.

While Auto Industry Fights To Lower CAFE Standards, Tesla Motors Wants Them Raised

Back in 1975 as a result of the Arab Oil Embargo, the U.S. Congress passed the Energy Policy and Conservation Act: a legal framework designed to increase energy production and supply, reduce energy demand and improve energy efficiencies of everything from cars to home appliances and equipment.

Tesla is alone in its fight against Ford and other automakers keen to lobby for lower CAFE standards.

Tesla is alone in its fight against Ford and other automakers keen to lobby for lower CAFE standards.

As part of that act, the Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards were born, requiring automakers to ensure that the average fuel economy of all passenger cars, light trucks and medium-duty passenger vehicles produced by each automaker met increasingly tough fuel economy standards. In the 40 years since the act passed, subsequent legislation has tightened CAFE standards, adding new ways to measure fuel economy and driving the average fuel economy of new cars ever-higher.

With CAFE standards pushing the limits of conventional internal combustion engine vehicle design and forcing automakers to use smaller, 4-cylinder engines in place of throaty V-6 and V-8 options, automakers have spent billions of dollars to date in their attempt to lobby Congress to ease the regulations. Some auto industry executives even claim the automotive industry is at risk of financial ruin, forced to spend billions of dollars to develop new drivetrains just to meet CAFE standards.

But while the majority of automakers are hoping for a change of heart in Congress, Tesla Motors [NASDAQ:TSLA] is readying its own legal team to make the case that the U.S. government needs to make its fuel economy targets more stringent.

As The Wall Street Journal reports, Tesla Motors will be making its case for keeping CAFE standards as they currently stand, or making them even more stringent, increasing the current CAFE target of 54.5 miles per gallon by 2025.

Automakers argue that customers aren't buying fuel efficient vehicles.

Automakers argue that customers aren’t buying fuel efficient vehicles.

It will be doing battle directly with automakers like General Motors and Toyota, both of which are said to be readying arguments for relaxing current CAFE standards ahead of a federal review of CAFE targets scheduled for 2017.

As The Wall Street Journal notes, both companies have enjoyed a recent sales bloom for large SUVs and pickup trucks in the U.S., driven in part by low gas prices in the past twelve months or so.

They argue, as most other automakers do, that the targets are just too high to meet — and that car buyers aren’t interested in affordable small cars with small-capacity engines or expensive plug-in or hydrogen fuel cell cars with limited range.

Dairmuid O’Connell, Tesla’s vice president of development, disagrees. Planning to argue with auto industry executives in Michigan this week that automakers are capable of meeting regulations for fuel economy, he’s adamant that more could — and should be done to improve overall vehicle efficiency.

Tesla says automakers can do more -- and should to more.

Tesla says automakers can do more — and should to more.

“We are about to hear a lot of rhetoric that Americans don’t want to buy electric vehicles,” he told The Wall Street Journal. “From an empirical standpoint, the [regulations] are very week, eminently achievable and the only thing missing is the will to put compelling products on the road.”

Yet there is a change in Detroit and elsewhere. Automakers who once dismissed Tesla as a startup company with no future prospects are now taking note. Some are even beginning to plan their own cars to compete with the Californian firm.

Eighteen months ago, Tesla was the only automaker planning to bring a mass-market, long-range affordable car to market. Now Nissan, GM, and Volkswagen are all promising the same thing in short order, while BMW, Audi and Porsche are rumoured to be working on their own all-electric crossover SUVs to cross-shop against Tesla’s soon-to-launch Model X.

While those companies are working hard to ensure they don’t lose any more custom to Tesla however, they’re also working a two-pronged approach with Congress, lobbying the EPA to change CAFE standards to their advantage.

Alternative fuelled vehicles are costing automakers more to make -- but that's often due to entrenched production methods.

Alternative fuelled vehicles are costing automakers more to make — but that’s often due to entrenched production methods.

Arguing that customers aren’t buying the vehicles they’re making, their lobbyists say more assistance will be needed before current CAFE targets are met.

“Auto makers are offering consumers more choice than ever in energy-efficient vehicles, but that’s not enough,” said a spokesperson for the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, a company working to represent more than a dozen automakers including GM, Toyota and Ford on the matter in Washington, D.C. “We need consumers to buy them in high volumes to meet the steep climb in fuel-economy standards ahead.”

As those who watched the seminal film Who Killed The Electric Car? will know however, profit-driven automakers keen to protect the interests of their shareholders have been in a similar position before. As the film recounts, GM, Ford, Honda, Nissan and Toyota successfully lobbied the Californian Air Resource Board to lower repeal the Zero Emission Mandate with the argument that consumers weren’t interested in plug-in vehicles and the vehicles themselves were too costly to produce.

As soon as the standards were relaxed, so too was the push towards fuel-efficient vehicles by the automakers.

This time, we’re confident that the auto industry isn’t after killing the electric car altogether. Indeed, given the sales figures to date and the rising market share, doing so would be an act of suicide given the existence of Tesla, an automaker willing, ready and able to continue making plug-in vehicles. Indeed, it’s in Tesla’s interests for the CAFE standards to increase, since it gives it a market advantage other automakers can’t yet match.

Despite producing the Volt and planning the Bolt EV, GM is among the automakers lobbying for a reduction in CAFE requirements.

Despite producing the Volt and planning the Bolt EV, GM is among the automakers lobbying for a reduction in CAFE requirements.

Producing the fastest full-size performance sedan on the market today and some of the most advanced cars in the world, Tesla can’t be ignored — even if the auto industry succeeds in its attempts to lower CAFE standards.

But given President Obama’s recent unveiling of a tougher climate change plan to lessen or halt the seemingly impossible march of manmade global warming, we suspect automakers won’t have as easy a time with the EPA as those automakers did back in California more than a decade ago.

[Hat-tip: Mark]


Want to keep up with the latest news in evolving transport? Don’t forget to follow Transport Evolved on Twitter, like us on Facebook and G+, and subscribe to our YouTube channel.

You can also support us directly as a monthly supporting member by visiting

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Share on LinkedInDigg thisShare on RedditEmail this to someonePin on Pinterest

Related News

  • Chris O

    Yes, lack of commitment to electric cars would be an “act of suicide given the existence of Tesla”. No doubt that’s why GM is a main driving force behind the legal battles against Tesla focussed on its Achilles heal: its need for a retail model that fits its product that doesn’t generate the sort of maintenance income that keeps franchise dealers funded and needs a dedicated sales approach.

    Tesla is standing in the way of business as usual for an industry that has the lobby infrastructure in place and a corrupt system on its side to make its life quite difficult. Maybe arguing for more stringent emission mandates is ill advised for a company in a vulnerable position like that. Then again: maybe it’s an offence is the best defence thing.

  • jeffsongster

    This is definitely the same old song and dance. Gotta love the pure compliance players… no dc quick chargers, go to their dealers and ask to see an electric and they will try to sell you a gasser instead with every ignorant comment they can muster about the state of electric cars these days… wow… 4 hours to recharge? really?.
    I’m just glad that Tesla, Nissan, VW, and BMW are attempting to break through. At least the EPA will hear an argument in favor from manufacturers this time.

    The sooner one of the serious makers decides to make actual, competitive pickup truck… handles at minimum 1/2 ton of cargo, can tow nearly anything, can have a variety of cabs and beds, and can recharge a large battery for another 250 miles in the time it takes a diner to serve a meal, the other manufacturers will keep up or die. And I doubt that this time the taxpayers will be that eager to bail them a second time.

  • Mark Benjamin David

    CAFE standard needs to be raised, not lowered. The carmakers CAN meet it by making us the battery electric cars we want! (Since the EPA gave them the stupid MPGe). They need to be told to do this. We don’t want hydrogen, we want longer range battery electric cars, and they are capable of making them, they just don’t want to…one of the main reasons is because then people will find out they can get truly reliable cars that don’t need service but once a year at most.

  • D. Harrower

    “Arguing that customers aren’t buying the vehicles they’re making, their
    lobbyists say more assistance will be needed before current CAFE targets
    are met.”

    Typically corporate laziness. If you are a restauranteur and you cook a steak with low-grade meat that arrives cold to the customer and is very expensive, you don’t bitch about how nobody is buying your steak and go looking for a government handout; you cook a better steak or you go out of business.

    Most mainstream automakers have clearly forgotten how their beloved capitalism works.

Content Copyright (c) 2016 Transport Evolved LLC