Porsche CEO Says No to Autonomous Cars, Says iPhones Belong In Your Pocket, Not On The Road

With autonomous vehicles now widely predicted to become mass-market ready some time around 2020, there are very few automakers not working on some form of autonomous vehicle technology today. And with Tesla’s beta-versioned autopilot software already capable of driving most daily trips in autonomous mode today, luxury automakers like BMW, Mercedes-Benz and Audi are all keen to catch up.

Audi may have autonomous cars, but Porsche doesn't want to follow suit.

Audi may have autonomous cars, but Porsche doesn’t want to follow suit.

But while Audi and its parent company Volkswagen are already working hard to bring autonomous driving to the marketplace, Volkswagen’s performance brand Porsche has no intent to follow suit. What’s more, Porsche CEO Oliver Blume appears highly skeptical of autonomous driving technology in any form, despite the advances being made by its parent company in the area.

As Reuters reported earlier this week, Blume is vocal in his mistrust of cars that drive themselves. In an interview on Monday with Westfalen-Blatt — a local German Newspaper — Blume indicated that the reason people drove a Porsche was to experience the pleasure of driving. For that, they needed to be doing the driving themselves, rather than have an on-board computer do it for them.

Mercedes-Benz, like BMW, is eager to embrace autonomous drive.

Mercedes-Benz, like BMW, is eager to embrace autonomous drive.

“One wants to drive a Porsche by oneself,” Blume said. “An iPhone belongs in your pocket, not on the road.”

While Porsche has historically been a performance brand rather than a prestige or luxury brand, it has gradually blurred the lines in recent years, thanks in part to its high-performance sports SUVs and family-friendly coupes. But Blume’s comments indicate that Porsche is keen to retain its sports heritage, setting itself up as a drivers’ car rather than a luxury way of getting from A to B.

Using that argument would make more sense if Blume — and the Porsche brand — had a longstanding history of avoiding autonomous driving technology. Yet that’s not the case: back in 2011, Porsche began work on a system called ACC InnoDrive. Still in development as of last year, InnoDrive is not a conventional autonomous drive system but rather a sophisticated cruise control system designed to maximize fuel economy and speed.

It works like this: rather than do the driving for you, InnoDrive pays attention to regular trips you make, recording a whole host of data about the the car’s speed, position and road conditions. After the trip has been made a few times, the car then offers to take over the operation of the accelerator and brake for you, pushing itself as hard as is possible along a route and leaving you to just focus on the steering.

It is, to put it simply, a half-way house between full autonomy and cruise control, one that Porsche seems intent on following, despite Blume’s comments to the contrary.

What does this mean for Porsche? If we’re honest, we think the German automaker will lose out to its rival brands if it decides not to pursue autonomous drive technology, much in the same way that (to date) it has missed a potentially lucrative place in the electric vehicle marketplace by holding off on developing an all-electric sports car for as long as it has.

Will Porsche lose out to Tesla? Almost certainly, in our opinion.

Will Porsche lose out to Tesla? Almost certainly, in our opinion.

While Porsche is trying to rectify that particular issue — namely with the Porsche Mission E electric sports sedan it is promising will launch some time in 2018 — we can’t help but think that without at least some form of autonomous vehicle capabilities, the Mission E just won’t be able to confidently cross-shop against the competition.

By that point, Mercedes-Benz is expected to have autonomous-capable luxury and performance cars, while the Tesla Model S and Tesla Model X already have basic autopilot capabilities today. Were the Mission E far superior to any other electric car in terms of range, acceleration and performance, we could overlook the omission of autonomous capabilities. But as it stands right now, that’s not the case.

Is Porsche right to focus on the driver rather than autonomous technology? And will customers opt for the Prestige of the Porsche brand when other companies produce cars that outperform its vehicles in many areas?

Leave your thoughts in the Comments below.


Want to keep up with the latest news in evolving transport? Don’t forget to follow Transport Evolved on Twitter, like us on Facebook and G+, and subscribe to our YouTube channel.

You can also support us directly as a monthly supporting member by visiting Patreon.com.

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Share on LinkedInDigg thisShare on RedditEmail this to someonePin on Pinterest

Related News

  • Andy Mitchell

    Thoroughly agree with the sentiment, if not the argument. I really cannot see the point of autonomous cars and I am very doubtful whether they will be taken up by more than a handful of people. I’m also very suspicious of the motives of car makera and governments – this is taking away the focus and funding for EVs and better battery technology.

    • Michael Thwaite

      I’m rather on the other side of the argument; I actually see autonomous cars as the savior of driving fun, much like I see EVs as the savior of the classic mini. On our current trajectory, we’re looking at more cars on the road, greater pollution, higher demand for limited fuel and road/parking space and a resulting push to public transport, something I’m not a fan of. As EVs leave the gasoline for the auto enthusiast to use, autonomous vehicles leave the roads less congested for the enthusiast driver and, due to their greater efficiency in terms of road use, they offer a compelling alternative to public transport or road expansion. I’d definitely use autonomous vehicles to get into the city to see a show and our lone family car at the weekend for fun.

      • Farmer_Dave

        Michael, as far “As EVs leave the gasoline for the auto enthusiast to use”, you really need to drive a Tesla before you decide that ICE cars are for auto enthusiasts!

        • vdiv

          Pssst. He does drive a Tesla 🙂

          • Farmer_Dave

            Then I REALLY don’t understand his statement.

      • James Coates

        I agree. Autonomous vehicles are the way forward, not to take away the thrill of driving, but to lessen the burden. Driving at times is stressful, tiring and unpleasant. Any automaker that can take that away gets my vote. I think in years to come our high powered, high reving ICE cars will be used solely for fun and remembering how things used to be….. On a Sunday 😊

  • Chris O

    Looks like Porsche is waking up to one of the changes autonomous driving will bring: less demand for “drivers cars”. All cars will be cabs basically. Once autonomous driving gets refined enough to offer a satisfying experience that is. Personally I expect that humans will make quicker progress in complex urban environments than machines for a long time to come, but on the highway surely even the average Porsche driver will expect autonomous features pretty soon.

  • vdiv

    Driver assist features are important and one begins to truly appreciate them when they get older. I am not sure machines and software have proven more reliable as they are after all still made by humans.

    There are some of us who enjoy driving (gasp!). While that is the case there will be a marker for human-driven cars.

  • Antony Collingwood

    Driving the car is the most important part of the car. If I wasn’t driving my car I wouldn’t want a car. I’d probably keep the one I have. Driving is my hobby. I admire porsche for retaining its values, millions of people enjoy the pleasure of driving. I wouldn’t even consider a car I wouldn’t enjoy driving, a car isn’t just transport, to so many of us they are our pride and joy, like most motorbikes are to their riders.